Ortiz

(PC) Greene v. Ortiz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20221:18-cv-01330California925 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RASHAN GREENE, No. 1:18-cv-01330-ADA-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

M. ORITZ, et al., FOR RELIEF FROM A FINAL JUDGMENT

Defendant. (ECF No. 18) 16 17 On March 15, 2019, Plaintiff Rashan Greene (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which was dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (See ECF Nos. 16, 17.) On May 10, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for relief from a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff’s motion seeks relief based on “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect” under Rule 60(b)(1) and “any other reason that justifies relief” under Rule 60(b)(6). (Id. at 3.) The Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion fails to demonstrate that he is entitled to relief from the court’s judgment under either subsection of Rule 60. /// 28 I. LEGAL STANDARD Under Rule 60(b),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.