Beard

Beard v. County of Stanislaus

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20221:21-cv-00841California831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHANE BEARD, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00841-ADA-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO

FILE AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT

v. OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., FOR EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES

AND DATES RELATED THERETO

Defendants. (ECF No. 42)

DEADLINE: OCTOBER 5, 2022

18 Plaintiffs Shane Beard, Hilda Perez, and N.P.’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this action on May 24, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On September 26, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an “ex parte motion for miscellaneous administrative relief; extension of time for expert witness disclosures and dates related thereto,” which they appear to bring pursuant to Local Rules 144 and 233, and this Court’s standing order. (ECF No. 42 at 6–7 (caption capitalizations removed).) “The expression ‘ex parte motion’ is a term of art. In its pure form it means a request a party makes to the court without any notice to the other side.” Mission…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.