Beard
Beard v. County of Stanislaus
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20221:21-cv-00841California831 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SHANE BEARD, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00841-ADA-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO
FILE AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT
v. OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., FOR EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES
AND DATES RELATED THERETO
Defendants. (ECF No. 42)
DEADLINE: OCTOBER 5, 2022
18 Plaintiffs Shane Beard, Hilda Perez, and N.P.’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this action on May 24, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On September 26, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an “ex parte motion for miscellaneous administrative relief; extension of time for expert witness disclosures and dates related thereto,” which they appear to bring pursuant to Local Rules 144 and 233, and this Court’s standing order. (ECF No. 42 at 6–7 (caption capitalizations removed).) “The expression ‘ex parte motion’ is a term of art. In its pure form it means a request a party makes to the court without any notice to the other side.” Mission…