Faggianelli

(PC) Hash v. Faggianelli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20222:17-cv-01721California360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH, No. 2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. RALLOS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion for a thirty-day extension of time to serve written discovery requests on defendants. ECF No. 74. The current deadline for serving written discovery expired on September 12, 2022. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), when a motion to extend time is made after the time has expired,1 the party must show excusable neglect. Although plaintiff does not expressly address the issue, his motion sufficiently establishes excusable neglect for the delay in filing. Good cause appearing, the motion will therefore be granted. The deadline for motions to compel will also be extended accordingly. Plaintiff is cautioned that in the future, if he files a motion for an extension of time after the deadline he seeks to extend has already passed, he must explain why he failed to file the motion before the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.