Akkawi

Akkawi v. Sadr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20222:20-cv-01034California6,503 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIANA AKKAWI, et al., No. 2:20-cv-1034 MCE AC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER KASRA SADR, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on four motions to compel from plaintiff, erroneously filed in one docket entry at ECF No. 77, but briefed with four separate joint statements, two of which are identical (ECF Nos. 90 and 92), and one of which is not a joint statement but an affidavit pursuant to Local Rule 251(d) (ECF No. 93). These discovery motions were referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(1). The document filed at ECF No. 92 is STRICKEN because it is a duplicate. The court will rule on the remaining briefed discovery motions: ECF No. 90: Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents Not Produced by Defendant VIN; ECF No. 91: Motion to Compel Responses to Questions not Answered by Defendant Kasra Sadr for Himself and Defendant Nationwide VIN Marketing in their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.