(PC) Kulp v. Stanislaus County Sheriff Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20221:22-cv-00829California753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY JAMES KULP, No. 1:22-cv-00829-ADA-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART AND

STANISLAUS CNTY. SHERIFF DEPT., ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND et al., (ECF No. 8) Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Anthony James Kulp is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302, this matter was assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge. On August 19, 2022, the Magistrate Judge screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations suggesting that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 8.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were due within fourteen days. (Id. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.