King

King v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20222:20-cv-01326California5,883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Travis King, No. 2:20-cv-01326-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. City of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Travis King was arrested and jailed for a crime he did not commit. Mr. King 18 filed this case against the City of Sacramento, Officer Jonathan Houston, Officer Anthony Boler, Costco Wholesale Corporation, and its employee Eric Klockenbrink alleging constitutional and 20 state law violations. The City of Sacramento, Officer Houston and Officer Boler now move for summary judgment. After consideration of the parties’ briefs and oral arguments, and for the 22 reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. A jury could conclude 23 the officers recklessly omitted material information from their warrant application and that their 24 actions violated California law. 25 I. BACKGROUND The following facts are either undisputed or construed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.