Aung

(PC) Beinlick v. Aung

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20222:19-cv-02095California4,923 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN BEINLICK, No. 2:19-cv-2095 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SANDAR AUNG, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner represented by counsel, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Two motions to dismiss are before the court, one brought by San Joaquin County and Dr. Alexander Liu (the “County defendants”) (ECF No. 16) and one brought by Dr. Sandar Aung, Dr. Monrivin Son, and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (the “CDCR defendants”) (ECF No. 24). Both motions are fully briefed. See ECF Nos. 16, 20, 22, 24, 26, 27. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that both motions be granted in part and denied in part. //// //// //// I. THE COMPLAINT A. Overview The second…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.