(PC)Calderon

(PC)Calderon v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20222:21-cv-01896California3,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN CARLOS CALDERON, No. 2:21-cv-01896-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER K. ALLISON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On January 20, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and concluded that it contained too many vague and conclusory allegations to be able to determine whether it stated any cognizable claims for relief or was frivolous. ECF No. 9. The court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint, but granted him leave to amend. ECF No. 9. The screening order provided plaintiff with the relevant legal standards that appeared to apply to his allegations and advised him that unrelated claims against different defendants must be pursued in separate lawsuits. Id. at 8. Plaintiff filed a first amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.