Borden
Borden v. Bare
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CHLOE PSALM JERI BORDEN, CASE NO. 1:20-cv-01103-AWI-EPG
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DEPUTY ETHAN BARE; DEPUTY JEREMY MALICOAT, (Doc. No. 23) 10 Defendants
13 This case stems from an arrest of Plaintiff Chloe Psalm Jeri Borden by Defendants Fresno 14 County Sheriff’s Deputies Ethan Bare and Jeremy Malicoat. Plaintiff filed suit pursuant to 42 15 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of her rights protected by the First and Fourth Amendments to 16 the United States Constitution. Doc. No. 1. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for 17 Summary Judgment. Doc. No. 23. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant 18 Defendants’ Motion.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT FRAMEWORK
20 Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is 21 appropriate when it is demonstrated that there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact and 22 that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P.…