Funderburk

(PC) Outhoummountry v. Funderburk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20221:22-cv-00954California3,703 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 STACEN OMAR Case No. 1:22-cv-00954-JLT-BAM (PC)

OUTHOUMMOUNTRY,

SCREENING ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT v. (ECF No. 1) FUNDERBURK, et al., 12 Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 13 14 Plaintiff Stacen Omar Outhoummountry (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on August 1, 2022, is before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 1.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.