Warden
(HC) Leavy v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
CARNELL A. LEAVY, 1:22-cv-00915-ADA-HBK (HC) Petitioner,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
WARDEN, (Doc. No. 10)
Respondent.
16 17 Before the court is Petitioner’s motion to appoint counsel. (Doc. No. 10). Petitioner, a state prisoner, has pending a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). Petitioner requests the court to appoint counsel to represent him because the state courts “overlooked” or “missed” his argument on appeal and in his state habeas petition. (Doc. No. 10). There is no automatic, constitutional right to counsel in federal habeas proceedings. See Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 752 (1991); Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958). The Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, however, authorizes this court to appoint counsel for a financially eligible person who seeks relief under § 2241 when the “court determines that the…