(HC)Kuzminskiy

(HC)Kuzminskiy v. Matteson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20222:22-cv-00041California355 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GENNADIY KUZMINSKIY, No. 2:22-cv-0041-WBS-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER G. MATTESON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 10, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (Docket No. 14.) Petitioner then filed a response requesting additional time due to COVID-10 lockdowns at his facility and also stating that he objected to dismissal. (Docket No. 15.) The magistrate judge gave plaintiff an additional sixty days to respond to defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Docket No. 16.) However, plaintiff did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.