Smart

Primerica Life Ins. Co. v. Smart

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20222:21-cv-00422California2,668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PRIMERICA LIFE INSURANCE No. 2:21-cv-0422 KJM AC

COMPANY,

11 Plaintiff,1 12 v. ORDER and

PERRY L. SMART; WANDA CLARK;

and MORGAN JONES FUNERAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

HOMES INC.,

15 Defendants.

PERRY L. SMART,

18 Cross-Claimant, 19 v. 20 WANDA CLARK and MORGAN JONES FUNERAL HOMES, INC., Cross-Defendants. 23 Cross-complainant Perry L. Smart has filed a motion for default judgment against co- defendants Wanda Clark and Morgan Jones Funeral Home (“MJFH”). ECF No. 36. The motion

Plaintiff has been terminated from this action, as reflected on the docket and explained below. The dispute before the court is among defendants. 28 is based on Smart’s cross-complaint against Clark and MJFH. ECF No. 28. The Clerk of Court has entered default against Clark and MJFH based on their failure to respond to the cross- complaint. ECF Nos. 34, 35. The undersigned initially recommended denial of the motion for insufficient factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.