Clendenin

(PC) Felix v. Clendenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20221:19-cv-01784California539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT EMERSON FELIX, Case No. 1:19-cv-01784-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

v. FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

CLENDENIN, et al., NUNC PRO TUNC Defendants. (ECF No. 47) 16 Plaintiff Scott Emerson Felix (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). As Plaintiff is a civil detainee and has paid the filing fee, he is not a prisoner or proceeding in forma pauperis, and therefore the Court ordered the complaint to be served without screening. (ECF No. 13.) This action therefore proceeds on Plaintiff’s complaint, filed December…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.