Jerry Cox v. Mariposa County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20221:19-cv-01105California9,508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JERRY COX, an Individual, and JDC LAND CASE NO. 1:19-cv-01105-AWI-BAM COMPANY, LLC, a limited liability company,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs,

DENYING IN PART COUNTY

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

MARIPOSA COUNTY; SHERIFF DEPUTY

WILLIAM ATKINSON; SHERIFF DEPUTY

WESLEY SMITH; ASHLEY HARRIS, AND

DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE,

(Doc. No. 135) Defendants. 14 15 16 Defendants Mariposa County, William Atkinson and Wesley Smith (collectively, the “County Defendants”) bring a motion to dismiss certain aspects of the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. No. 135. The motion has been fully briefed and deemed suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). Doc. No. 157. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.