Stevens
(PC) Kamali v. Stevens
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20221:19-cv-01432California3,553 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARBI KAMALI, Case No.: 1:19-cv-01432-JLT-GSA (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART
vs. (Doc. 49.)
STEVENS, et al., ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
Defendants. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS
16 (Doc. 37.) 17 Defendant moved for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by the favorable termination rule set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). (Doc. 37.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the motion be denied. (Doc. 49.) Defendants filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. 50.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Defendants’ objections, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record…