Stevens

(PC) Kamali v. Stevens

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20221:19-cv-01432California3,553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARBI KAMALI, Case No.: 1:19-cv-01432-JLT-GSA (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART

vs. (Doc. 49.)

STEVENS, et al., ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

Defendants. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

16 (Doc. 37.) 17 Defendant moved for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by the favorable termination rule set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). (Doc. 37.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the motion be denied. (Doc. 49.) Defendants filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. 50.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Defendants’ objections, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.