Nevis
Nevis v. Rideout Memorial Hospital
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DANIEL NEVIS, No. 2:17-cv-02295-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. TENTATIVE RULINGS ON MOTIONS IN
LIMINE
RIDEOUT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al. (Doc. Nos. 161, 162, 163, 165, 167, 168, 169, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 178, 179, 180, Defendants. 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188)
17 The matter is before the court on the motions in limine filed on behalf of defendants Rideout Memorial Hospital (“Rideout”) (Doc. Nos. 161, 162, 163), Dr. Hector Lopez (Doc. Nos. 165, 167, 168, 169, 171, 180, 184), National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) (Doc. Nos. 176, 178, 179, 181, 183, 185, 186), and plaintiff Joseph Daniel Nevis (Doc. Nos. 172, 173, 174, 175, 182, 187, 188). The court now issues the following tentative rulings addressing the parties’ motions in limine. See City of Pomona v. SQM N. Am. Corp., 866 F.3d 1060, 1070 (9th Cir. 2017) (noting that “a ruling on a motion in…