Gomez

(PC) Thompson v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20221:18-cv-00125California2,857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK SHANE THOMPSON, Case No. 1:18-cv-00125-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS IN LIMINE

A. GOMEZ, et al., (ECF No. 127)

Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Mark Shane Thompson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants Gomez, Weiss, Sazo, and Gray, and on Plaintiff’s related failure to intervene claim against Defendants Johnson and Busby, arising from a takedown incident that took place on May 30, 2017. The case is set for a jury trial on October 17, 2022. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion in limine, filed September 13, 2022. Plaintiff did not file an opposition and the time to do so has expired. I. LEGAL STANDARD “A motion in limine is a procedural mechanism to limit in advance testimony or evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.