Gastelum

Gastelum v. Easiness LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20221:22-cv-00166California2,246 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:22-cv-00166-ADA-BAK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT BE

DENIED

EASINESS LP,

(ECF No. 17). 14 Defendant. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

16 Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this action against Defendant Easiness LP (“Defendant”). (See ECF No. 1). On September 2, 2017, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default against Defendant. (ECF No. 17). For the following reasons, the Court recommends that Plaintiff’s request be denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the complaint on February 8, 2022, violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and other laws. (ECF No. 1). Generally, Plaintiff asserts that he visited a DoubleTree by Hilton in Bakersfield, California on July 1, 2022. (Id. at 1). This business is purportedly owned or operated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.