Taiarol

(PC) Rodriguez v. Taiarol

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20222:21-cv-01958California2,899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN R. RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:21-cv-1958 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RYAN TAIAROL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that he was improperly classified as a gang member in prison, and after his release the wrongful gang classification was used by police to obtain search and arrest warrants. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an in forma pauperis application (ECF No. 13), motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 14), and his amended complaint (ECF No. 11) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the motion for extension of time as moot, grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to submit his in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.