(SS) Hamm v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20222:21-cv-00645California1,894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACK HAMM, Case No. 2:21-cv-00645-JDP (SS) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

v. DENYING THE COMMISSIONER’S CROSS-

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ECF Nos. 13 & 14 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 13 & 14. The court grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, denies the Commissioner’s motion, and remands this matter for further administrative proceedings. Standard of Review An Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying an application for disability benefits will be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence in the record and if the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.