Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20221:21-cv-01461California734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADAM JAY STONE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01461-ADA-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

v. (ECF No. 41) C. PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the complaint, filed September 8, 2022. Plaintiff seeks leave to file amend the complaint to specify the amount of damages sought. (ECF No. 41.) Rule 15(a)(2) provides that “[t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires,” and the Ninth Circuit has directed courts to apply this policy with “extreme liberality.” DCD Programs, Ltd. v. Leighton, 833 F.2d 183, 186 (9th Cir. 1987). When determining whether to grant leave to amend under Rule 15(a)(2), a court should consider the following factors: (1) undue delay, (2) bad faith, (3) futility of amendment, and (4)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.