Saipher
(PC) Clark v. Saipher
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20222:21-cv-01326California1,125 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHRISTOPHER C. CLARK, Case No. 2:21-cv-01326-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: v. (1) PROCEED ONLY WITH HIS
EIGHTH AMENDMENT
MARSHALL SAIPHER, et al., DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE AND
CALIFORNIA TORT CLAIMS ACT
Defendants. CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS
SAIPHER AND NASEER; OR
15 (2) DELAY SERVING ANY DEFENDANT AND FILE AN
AMENDED COMPLAINT
17 ECF No. 18
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, alleges that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by denying him adequate medical care for internal hemorrhoids. ECF No. 18 at 4-5. He also brings those same claims under the California Torts Claims Act (“CTCA”). Id. at 14. After reviewing the allegations in the amended complaint, I find that plaintiff has stated cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference and CTCA claims against defendants Saipher and…