Saipher

(PC) Clark v. Saipher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20222:21-cv-01326California1,125 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHRISTOPHER C. CLARK, Case No. 2:21-cv-01326-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: v. (1) PROCEED ONLY WITH HIS

EIGHTH AMENDMENT

MARSHALL SAIPHER, et al., DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE AND

CALIFORNIA TORT CLAIMS ACT

Defendants. CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS

SAIPHER AND NASEER; OR

15 (2) DELAY SERVING ANY DEFENDANT AND FILE AN

AMENDED COMPLAINT

17 ECF No. 18

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, alleges that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by denying him adequate medical care for internal hemorrhoids. ECF No. 18 at 4-5. He also brings those same claims under the California Torts Claims Act (“CTCA”). Id. at 14. After reviewing the allegations in the amended complaint, I find that plaintiff has stated cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference and CTCA claims against defendants Saipher and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.