(SS) Luis Antonio Frausto v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20221:21-cv-01132California10,182 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS ANTONIO FRAUSTO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01132-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

SECURITY APPEAL

v. (ECF Nos. 16, 18) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Luis Antonio Frausto (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Plaintiff argues the ALJ erred by: (1) finding the opinion from Dr. Marie Flores (“Dr. Flores”) not persuasive without proper consideration of the supportability and consistency of the opinion with the record; and (2) by failing to include work-related limitations in the RFC consistent with the nature and intensity of Plaintiff’s limitations, and failing to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.