D.M.
D.M. v. County of Merced
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
D.M., et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00409-JLT-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
v. (ECF Nos. 99, 105, 106) COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees pertaining to their previously-adjudicated motions to compel Requests for Production (RFP) Nos. 10, 11, 20, and 21. (ECF No. 99) The parties appeared for the hearing on the motion on September 21, 2022. (ECF No. 109.) Counsel Christopher A Lisieski appeared in person on behalf of Plaintiffs. (Id.) Counsel Peter Bertling appeared via videoconference on behalf of Defendants. (Id.) Having considered the moving papers, declarations and exhibits attached thereto, the parties’ oral arguments, as well as the Court’s file, the Court issues the following order granting in part the motion for attorneys’ fees. …