(PC) Rojas v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01244-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
Defendant. DAYS 16 On July 25, 2022, I notified Mr. Rojas that he did not properly commence a civil action because he submitted to the court an unsigned complaint. ECF No. 3. I granted him thirty days to file a complaint and submit either the $402 filing fee or a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. To date, Mr. Rojas has not complied with that order. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest…