Barbosa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS BARBOSA, et al., No. 2:20-cv-02298-JAM-DMC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SHASTA COUNTY, et al. ON CLAIM SEVEN Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (“MSJ”). See MSJ, ECF No. 38. Following the Court’s hearing on this matter, the parties submitted supplemental briefs on Plaintiff’s seventh cause of action for violations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Rehabilitation Act (“RA”). See First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), ECF No. 20; see also Pls.’ Supplemental Brief (“Brief”), ECF No. 54; Defs.’ Response to Pls.’ Supplemental Brief (“Response”), ECF No. 57. Summary judgment is appropriate when the record, read in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, indicates “that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of…