(PS) Littleton v. Fickenworth Pena

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20222:22-cv-01025California716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LITTLETON, No. 2:22-cv-1025-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ALEXIS FICKENWORTH PENA, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated, filed a pro se complaint and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis on June 13, 2022. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). By order signed on August 4, 2022 (ECF No. 6), the undersigned screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and determined the complaint was subject to dismissal for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff was advised of the deficiencies in the complaint and was granted 30 days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time granted for plaintiff to file an amended complaint has expired…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.