Hicks

(PC) Washington v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20221:19-cv-00156California807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACY BERNARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-JLT-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

vs. (ECF No. 140.)

HICKS, et al.,

Defendants.

15 I. BACKGROUND Tracye Benard Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Complaint filed on February 5, 2019, against sole defendant Sergeant David Hicks (“Defendant”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.)1 On September 19, 2022, the court denied Plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant Rocha to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery because defendant Rocha was dismissed from this case on August 11, 2022, and because Plaintiff’s motion to compel was untimely. (ECF No. 136.) On September 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed objections to the court’s order, which the court construes as 25 26 1 On August 11, 2022,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.