Gastelum

Gastelum v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20221:22-cv-00792California368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:22-cv-00792-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

v. COMPLAINT AS MOOT PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, (Doc. 5)

INC.,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum, proceeding pro se, filed the instant action on June 27, 2022. (Doc. 1.) Defendant Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) on September 12, 2022. (Doc. 5.) The motion is set for hearing before the undersigned on November 4, 2022. (Id.) Plaintiff responded to defendant’s motion by filing a first amended complaint on September 23, 2022. (Doc. 12.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1) permits a party to amend its pleading once as “a matter of course” within 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). An…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.