Kibler
(PC) Peyton v. Kibler
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEE EDWARD PEYTON, No. 2:21-cv-0719 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BRIAN KIBLER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On May 26, 2022, defendants were directed to supplement their responses and to submit certain items for in camera review. Defendants have submitted such items and filed a notice of compliance with the discovery order attesting to their further discovery responses and supplemental responses. (ECF No. 63.) The court has completed an in camera review, and grants production as to one of the two remaining issues. During the pendency of the review, defendants moved to modify the scheduling order. Good cause appearing, such motion is granted. 1. CDCR Non-compliance tracking In response to Requests for Production 10 and 13, none of the confidential documents broke out correctional officers by their work during meal service. In addition, there were very few…