(PC) Villareal v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20221:15-cv-01410California1,113 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELAINE K. VILLAREAL, Case No. 1:15-cv-01410-ADA-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (ECF No. 253) COUNTY OF FRESNO, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Elaine K. Villareal is proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 29, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff’s counsel to file a notice informing the Court whether a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum is necessary to secure Plaintiff’s attendance at the trial. (ECF No. 250). On September 30, 2022, Plaintiff’s counsel filed his response. (ECF No. 251). On October 3, 2022, the Court issued an order stating that it will not issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to secure Plaintiff’s attendance at trial or any other inmate witnesses’ attendance at trial. (ECF No. 252). On that same day, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the portion of the Court’s order stating that it will not issue…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.