Nevis

Nevis v. Rideout Memorial Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20222:17-cv-02295California1,636 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DANIEL NEVIS, No. 2:17-cv-02295-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER RULING ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE RIDEOUT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et (Doc. Nos. 161, 162, 163, 165, 167, 168, 169, al. 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188) Defendants. 16 The matter is before the court on the motions in limine filed on behalf of defendants Rideout Memorial Hospital (“Rideout”) (Doc. Nos. 161, 162, 163), Dr. Hector Lopez (Doc. Nos. 165, 167, 168, 169, 171, 180, 184), National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) (Doc. Nos. 176, 178, 179, 181, 183, 185, 186), and plaintiff Joseph Daniel Nevis (Doc. Nos. 172, 173, 174, 175, 182, 187, 188). On September 30, 2022, the court issued tentative rulings addressing all of the parties’ motions in limine (Doc. No. 300), and on October 3, 2022, the court heard argument from the parties with respect to the motions and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.