Unknown

(HC) Dorsey v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20222:22-cv-00731California459 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROMALES DORSEY, Jr., Case No. 2:22-cv-00731-TLN-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE PAY THE FILING, FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO COMPLY

UNKNOWN, WITH COURT ORDERS Respondent. ECF No. 3 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS

17 On July 12, 2022, the court informed petitioner that he had not properly commenced a civil action and granted him thirty days to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus and either the $5 filing fee or an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 5. To date, petitioner has not complied with that order. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for petitioner’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.