EOP

(HC) Oskuie v. EOP

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20222:22-cv-01107California334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAYRAN MOHAMMAD OSKUIE, No. 2:22-cv-1107 WBS CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER EOP, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 11, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations on September 19, 2022, but still has not provided an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee as ordered by the magistrate judge. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.