McDonald

(HC) Lucero v. McDonald

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20221:10-cv-01714California334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT ANDREW LUCERO, Case No. 1:10-CV-01714-AWI-SKO-HC

Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE

v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.

16 Petitioner, Albert Andrew Lucero, is a state prisoner proceeding with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus on September 10, 2010, alleging five grounds for habeas relief: (1) improper admission of evidence; (2) violation of Petitioner’s right to confrontation; (3) insufficient evidence; (4) violation of Petitioner’s Due Process Rights; and (5) state law errors. On May 15, 2015, the District Court denied the petition and entered judgment for Respondent. Petitioner appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On August 31, 2018, the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the petition with instructions for this Court to grant Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus on his claim that his conviction for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.