(PC) Gray v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20221:20-cv-00196California2,300 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 THOMAS EUGENE GRAY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00196-JLT-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FIDNINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND AND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY KEN CLARK, et al., (ECF Nos. 73, 75) Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Thomas Eugene Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is currently set for jury trial before District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on February 13, 2023. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint and motion to reopen discovery, filed September 12, 2022 and September 13, 2022, respectively. (ECF Nos. 73, 75.) Defendants filed an opposition to both motions on October 3, 022. (ECF No. 82.) Although the time for Plaintiff to file a reply has not expired, the Court deems a reply unnecessary to resolve the motions. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.