Cates
(HC) Daniels v. Cates
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAY CHARLES DANIELS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00229-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE PAY THE FILING, FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO COMPLY
B. CATES , WITH COURT ORDERS Respondent. ECF No. 4 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
17 On March 9, 2022, the court ordered petitioner to submit, within thirty days, either the $5 filing fee or an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 4. To date, petitioner has not complied with that order. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for petitioner’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir.…