Steinburg

(PS) Bryant v. Steinburg

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20222:22-cv-01308California3,420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMIA L. BRYANT, et al., No. 2:22–cv–1308–TLN–KJN PS Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

COUNCIL AND FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS DARRELL STEINBURG, et al., (ECF No. 1, 4, 5.) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff’s initial complaint filed on July 25, 2022, alleged a Fourteenth Amendment due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as well as a claim under 18 U.S.C. § 241. (ECF No. 1.) The court granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), screened this complaint, and gave leave to amend. (See ECF No. 3.) Therein, the court found plaintiff failed to plead sufficient facts to support a due process claim, and determined she lacked authority to bring a claim under 18 U.S.C. § 241. (Id.) On September 9, 2022, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“1AC”) alleging claims under the Fair Housing Act 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 and 3614(a). (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff also filed a motion for appointment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.