Camp

(PC) Muhammad v. Camp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20222:21-cv-01477California445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANSAR EL MUHAMMAD, No. 2:21-cv-1477 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS G. CAMP, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants opened his legal mail outside his presence and failed to refer his grievance to internal affairs for further investigation. By order dated June 20, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint. (ECF No. 12.) The court found plaintiff stated a potentially cognizable retaliation claim against defendant Holmes. (Id. at 7.) The court also found that the complaint did not state any additional claims. (Id. at 5-9.) Plaintiff was given the option to proceed immediately on his retaliation claim against defendant Holmes or to amend the complaint. Plaintiff response stated that he elected to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) On July 25,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.