Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YAKINI DEANDRE BYRD, Case No. 1:19-cv-01343-ADA-HBK Plaintiff, GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. No. 72) F. SERRANO, Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. (Doc. No. 72). Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se on his amended civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, requests the Court to reconsider its July 20, 2022 order finding Plaintiff’s construed motion for summary judgment procedurally deficient. (Doc. Nos. 72, 70). In particular, the Court pointed out, among other things, that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment did not include an undisputed statement of facts, as required by Local Rule 260(a). (Doc. No. 70 at 2). Plaintiff attaches an undisputed statement of facts to his instant motion. (Doc. No. 72). Defendant opposes the motion for reconsideration. (Doc. No. 73). In addition to arguing the motion for reconsideration is procedurally defective,…