(PC) Head v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20222:19-cv-01663California4,456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES HEAD, No. 2: 19-cv-1663 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil action. For the reasons stated herein, the August 25, 2022 order to show cause (ECF No. 124) is discharged; the previously vacated motions (ECF Nos. 87, 89, 90, 94, 101) are reinstated; plaintiff’s motion to stay (ECF No. 101) is denied; defendant Endrizzi’s motion to compel (ECF No. 87) is granted in part; defendant Shelton’s motion to compel (ECF No. 94) is deemed resolved; and plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to conduct discovery (ECF No. 90) is denied. The undersigned will issue a separate order addressing plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 89). Vacated Motions On July 14, 2022, the undersigned vacated plaintiff’s motion for sanctions, plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to conduct discovery,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.