Daniels

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Daniels

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20221:21-cv-00643California6,926 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Case No. 1:21-cv-00643-JLT-BAK (EPG) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE

GRANTED

RAYMOND DANIELS, (ECF No. 25). Defendant.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for 18 default judgment against Defendant Raymond Daniels (“Defendant”) and request for attorneys’ fees and costs. The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(19). For the following reasons, the Court recommends granting the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action on April 16, 2021, alleging state law claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, express contractual indemnity, and money had and received arising from Defendant’s breach of the terms of an account agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant. (ECF No. 1).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.