(SS) Andrade v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20221:22-cv-00863California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 6 JUAN ANDRADE, No. 1:22-cv-00863-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

v. TO CLOSE CASE ACTING COMMISSIONER OF (Doc. 9)

SOCIAL SECURITY,

11 Defendant. 12 13 On October 5, 2022, the parties filed a joint “Stipulation for Dismissal.” (Doc. 9.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) provides: [T]he plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an 17 answer to a motion for summary judgment, or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Rule 41 thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed by all of the parties who have appeared, although an oral stipulation in open court will also suffice. See Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1472-73 (9th Cir. 1986). Once the stipulation between the parties who have appeared is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.