(PC) Warzek v. Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20221:20-cv-00027California1,202 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 MICHAEL WARZEK, No. 1:20-cv-00027-ADA-GSA (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER ADOPTING

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., (ECF No. 31)

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Michael Warzek is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by Plaintiff on February 4, 2020. (ECF No. 4.) On July 12, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s FAC under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and found the following cognizable claims: against defendants Warden Raythel Fisher, Jr., dining hall officer Paez, and culinary staff members Anguiano, Chapas, Lucero, Marquez, Cruz, and Moosebaur for violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), violation of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause, and adverse conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.