Vera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AUDREE CHATMAN, Case No. 1:18-cv-01463-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

v. TO TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO

PARTIES’ STIPULATION

H. VERA, (ECF No. 104) Defendant.

15 Plaintiff Audree Chatman is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 6, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as the case has been resolved in its entirety. (ECF No. 104.) Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) automatically terminates the action without operation of a court order.” Black Rock City, LLC v. Pershing Cty. Bd. of Comm’rs, 637 F. App’x…