Hiett

Hiett v. Housing Authority of Stanislaus County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20221:22-cv-00612California1,276 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEEDEE HIETT AND RAMON Case No. 1:22-cv-00612-JLT-EPG

MAGDALENO,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION v. TO REMAND AND AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS

STANISLAUS REGIONAL HOUSING

AUTH., et al., (Doc. 6) Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs commenced this action in the Superior Court for the County of Stanislaus on September 13, 2021. (See Doc. 1 at 2.) Plaintiffs appear to have filed a second amended complaint in that court on February 28, 2022. (Doc. 1 at 10.) On May 23, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a notice of removal, attempting to remove this action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). (See generally Doc. 1.) On June 16, 2022, Defendants timely filed a motion to remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447, pointing out, among other things, that a plaintiff is not authorized to remove a case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. This is indisputably correct. Section 1441(a) provides:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.