Brunk

(PC) Harris v. Brunk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20221:22-cv-00405California485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN HARRIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00405 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DIRECTING

D. BRUNK, et al., PAYMENT OF THE FILING FEE Defendants. (Docs. 7, 9) 16 Marvin Harris seeks to hold Defendants D. Brunk, Hampson, Figueroa, and John Doe liable for violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1.) On May 6, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the action. (Doc. 7.) The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff had at least three cases dismissed that qualified as a strike under Ninth Circuit authority before filing this action on April 8, 2022. (Doc. 9 at 5-6.) Therefore, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff is subject to the three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Id.) In addition, the magistrate judge found the complaint did not contain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.