Brunk
(PC) Harris v. Brunk
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN HARRIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00405 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DIRECTING
D. BRUNK, et al., PAYMENT OF THE FILING FEE Defendants. (Docs. 7, 9) 16 Marvin Harris seeks to hold Defendants D. Brunk, Hampson, Figueroa, and John Doe liable for violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1.) On May 6, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the action. (Doc. 7.) The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff had at least three cases dismissed that qualified as a strike under Ninth Circuit authority before filing this action on April 8, 2022. (Doc. 9 at 5-6.) Therefore, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff is subject to the three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Id.) In addition, the magistrate judge found the complaint did not contain…