Pfeiffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL HUDSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-954-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Docs. 20, 32) C. PFEIFFER; R. COX; J. DIAZ; D.

BALKIND; R. NUCKLES; A. SOTELO;

R. RODRIQUEZ; J. FERNANDEZ; J.

FIGUEROA; V. ESCOBEDO,

16 Defendant. 17 The magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted because the action is barred by the statute of limitations. (See generally Doc. 32.) Plaintiff timely filed his objections. In the objections, Plaintiff acknowledges that the magistrate judge found the complaint was filed in excess of the two-year statute of limitations by two months and twenty-nine days, but argues that the magistrate judge failed to consider the “imminent danger and excessive risk of harm by defendants[’] retaliations, threats, coercions, intimidation and fear of death.” (Id. at 1.) Plaintiff states he was hospitalized and had no access to the law library from…