Dickson

Dickson v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20221:21-cv-01824California2,049 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER DICKINSON, Case No. 1:21-cv-01824-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF

v. JURISDICTION AND MOOT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO DISMISS1

JOE BIDEN, JANET YELLEN,

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 1, 8) 16 Plaintiff Christopher Dickinson, a prisoner incarcerated at the California Correctional Institution proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a Complaint identifying President Joe Biden and Secretary of Treasury Janet Yellen as Defendants. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis but later paid the full filing fee. (See Doc. No. 2, Receipt No. CAE100049890). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the Complaint is frivolous. Further, Plaintiff’s “motion to dismiss” shall be terminated as moot. ////…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.